Quantcast The Reflector
College Media Network

The Reflector

Current Issue | Previous Issue

Neo-cons fail at economic fundamentals

Zen

Lazarus Austin

Issue date: 8/26/08 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1

As a libertarian conservative, it pains me to say this, but Barrack Obama's economics might make more sense than John McCain's. I will be the first to admit that, at this stage in my life, I am by no means an economic expert. However, that is what college, this newspaper and the criticism that go along with them help to cultivate.



The connotation (and paradox) is that, following the principles of big government, Democrats raise taxes, and Republicans, seeking to reduce the size of government, lower taxes. In short, this is generally true, but it does not tell the whole story. Take for example the two main presidential candidates, Obama and McCain.



McCain's plan rests on (big surprise here) lowering taxes, eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax and a vague but strong promise to eliminate wasteful pork barrel spending. Obama, on the other hand, wants to raise taxes, pull our troops out of Iraq and provide more benefits, as usual. Most of this information can be found on the candidates' Web sites and in very informative articles on The New York Times' Web site.



On the surface, it appears McCain will be the more market-oriented conservative, but that is not necessarily the case. As Republicans have been doing lately, he will continue to regulate the economy, rescue failed businesses and maintain major spending programs (such as all our overseas military commitments). Obama, on the other hand, will pull some financial drains while creating others, such as a socialized health care system, but will have the money to do it with.



Modern Republicans have failed to realize that if you decrease the size of the budget you have to decrease expenses. It's a simple enough principle not to buy something if you don't have the money for it. You see, personally, I believe in conservative principles such as small taxes and small government, but I can't trust most modern Republicans to implement those principles well.



I consider Obama's policies to be unfair and immoral, but at the same time, it is the only thing that is nearly responsible or will work right now. If I have worked harder all my life to make more than the average Joe, it is not fair for me to be taxed at a much higher rate than Joe.



Although I do not want to vote for McCain or Obama, I sometimes wonder whether I should vote for Obama because sometimes you have to bring yourself down in order to bring yourself back up. To quote "The Dark Knight" movie, "The night is darkest before the dawn." However, I do not entertain the thought for very long because I have too many disagreements with Obama.



You may ask, "If we have the money, why not spend it on well-intentioned programs like socialized health care?" Well, that is a topic for another article and your opinion to form. All I have to say for now is that I agree with McCain. We can't earmark money to every congressman's little pet project no matter how benevolent it seems.



Whatever your views, however, I have more respect for them if they are consistent and realistic.



Lazarus Austin is a senior majoring in history. He can be contacted at opinion@reflector.msstate.edu.


Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 7 of 12

Mark O'Neil

posted 8/28/08 @ 7:00 PM CST

Hello Lazarus,

The economy is fundamentally sound. We are no longer in a manufacturing based economy, we are now in a 21st century that is a service and specialization based economy. (Continued…)

Steven Smegma

posted 8/28/08 @ 8:54 PM CST

The breadth of Mark's comments are astounding. As he sounds we're about to elect Hitler or Lenin. However, for all of his rhetoric, Mark is mostly flawed in his logic. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jed Pressgrove

posted 8/29/08 @ 8:53 AM CST

I guess a homeownership crisis is just one indicator of a fundamentally sound economy.

Mark O'Neil

posted 9/06/08 @ 6:21 AM CST

Okay, if you want to talk about the specific problems with the current economy and connect them to "Neo-Cons" then connect the dots to support your opinions and please give an explanation why the following problems were the result of "Neo-Cons"

Two Major Problems Affecting Current U. (Continued…)

Ben Weinberg

posted 9/06/08 @ 1:27 PM CST

I would not really characterize John McCain's economic policies as "neo-conservative". Neo-conservatives have differing beliefs on domestic economic policy in contrast with their views on foreign policy. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Mark O'Neil

posted 9/07/08 @ 4:30 PM CST

FYI,

I'm a Constitutionalist and Libertarian in political belief, but pragmatically vote for the lesser of evil choices at hand.

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Matthew Walton

posted 9/17/08 @ 11:45 AM CST

Let me first say that I absolutely love this thread and it makes me very happy to find a place where both points being articulated in a rational manner. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

If you could choose one returning SEC West player to be on MSU's team, who would it be?
Submit Vote

View Results

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF

Advertisement